![google search why am i gay google search why am i gay](http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/ptVyFS8T9QI/maxresdefault.jpg)
- Google search why am i gay how to#
- Google search why am i gay software#
- Google search why am i gay torrent#
![google search why am i gay google search why am i gay](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/newscms/2020_03/2516676/80118-grindr-icon-dk-1208.jpg)
Ideally, even punctuation – something that the world has been begging Google to offer an ability to include in the search terms since forever *cough* C++ *cough* C# *cough*, but let’s focus on features they actually offered and have since taken away for now. Maybe Wikimedia’s new search engine will be the first, but with the way search engines have gone in the past, likely not. But unfortunately we have only a handful of startups re-using results harvested from the same APIs everyone but Google uses (Bing’s and sometimes Yandex’s). And I don’t mean a competitor to Google, a competitor to Google circa 2010 or even 2006 would instantly become my go-to engine. I use Google because it’s smart enough to include words like “help” or “assistance” when you search “aid” or “disk” when you search “drive” or “disc” – without them, we might as well go back to the days before full-text search and when the furthest NLP research had reached was dreams of HAL 9000.Īlas, it’s 2016 and there’s still no serious competitor to Google.
Google search why am i gay how to#
Unfortunately, this slippery slope of trying overly-hard to “interpret” what the user was “actually” looking for when 99% of us have already learned how to clarify that for the sake of search is only making Google’s results more-and-more useless.īefore anyone pipes up and comments about Google’s “literal search terms” option – been there, done that. And an overlap between “deluge” and “retina”? I think not. Right. Google did this because there weren’t enough results in a search with both the keywords and it felt bad about coming back empty-handed? Let’s check: 238,000 results with both keywords included – definitely not the case. Maybe there aren’t many results that match all your keywords or maybe some of them are redundant. If you use a long query, Google might ignore some of your keywords. What does Google have to say on the matter?
![google search why am i gay google search why am i gay](https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/181123170218-lgbt-taiwan-1.jpg)
The first result that Google bothered to actually look up with both keywords is exactly what we are looking for – but it was banished to fourth place thanks to Google’s overly-“intelligent” algorithm! 3 The first three results entirely omitted what is arguably the most-important of my two – only two! – keywords (and that’s only a call I would make if someone were to put a gun to my head and demand that I pick which of these virtually-equally relevant keywords was more important).
Google search why am i gay software#
Dismayed to find that all these years later, it still doesn’t support “retina” DPIs 2 and set out to see if anyone cared or if this software was really as dead-in-the-water as it seemed:
Google search why am i gay torrent#
Out of complete curiosity and having not used it out of a preference for Transmission, I decided to launch Deluge.app, a once-popular torrent client, and see how it fares. You’d assume that a two-word search query means a very high probability that each and every word 1 means something, as anyone – let alone a company whose entire raison d’être depends on natural language processing – could easily tell you. Let’s take a simple example: a two-word search query. Now? It seems like Google’s either come down with a rather bad case of human-robot transmitted alzheimer’s or else we’ve reached an all-new high when it comes to dumbing down the web (newspeak, anyone?). In an attempt to be helpful, Google would include additional search results with some keywords removed, so as to remove the burden of extra constraints and widen the search parameters somewhat. Initially, this search feature was reserved for only the most esoteric of search queries that typically turn up only a handful of results (under a few pages total) with all search terms included.
![google search why am i gay google search why am i gay](https://www.indiewire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/shutterstock_10312373e.jpg)
I am speaking of course about the dreaded “Missing: important_search_term” that seems to pop up in just about every search result, with an uncanny ability of picking the most relevant keywords and conveniently “forgetting” to include them in your search. This is all old news and has been hashed to death (and to no avail).īut in the past week or so, I’ve personally picked up on a rather annoying and dramatic uptick in incidences of Google’s penchant for – much like a three year old – understanding perfectly-well what it is that you want and pointedly doing anything but that. Be it social network integrations (Google+, Facebook connections, twitter feeds, etc), local results, results based off of previous queries (at least this one is in an attempt to show you “relevant” information), and more. In the past couple of years, there has been a conscious and very deliberate shift – and not just by Google – to go from showing you what you want to see to showing you what they want you to see. As most people are aware, Google search results are constantly changing and evolving.